
The following labels are used to provide traceability between Trillium practices and external references, source standards and practices:
SEI Refers to an SEI CMM v1.1 practice
ISO Refers to the ISO 9001 Standard or ISO 9000-3 Guideline
Bellcore Refers to a Bellcore document
MB Refers to the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria
IEC Refers to an IEC Standard (i.e., IEC 300)
IEEE Refers to an IEEE Software Engineering Standard
Trillium Indicates a practice unique to Trillium which has undergone cus
tomization in combining one or more of the above references
Roadmap Indicates a practice that is traceable to the external references
Trillium given above via another practice within the same roadmap which
has explicit external references
Practices are described in three wording styles which are progressively more difficult to achieve. These styles are not another scale.
The three wording styles are:
The practice may or may not state who does the activity. Two examples of this style of practice are:
"1.1.2.1 The organization has a well-defined three-year business plan
[Bellcore TR-NWT-000179 3.4.3-4] [MB 3.0] [Trillium]"
"4.1.2.20 Project planning specifies and documents schedules, resources
and approval authorities for verification and validation
activities [ISO 9001 4.4.2, 4.4.7, 4.4.8] [ISO 9000-3 5.5.2]
[Trillium]"
An example of Style 2 is:
"4.1.3.12 The project's development risks are identified, assessed,
documented, and managed according to a documented procedure
[SEI CMM Activity 10]."
For example:
"5.1.3.9 The quality system is reviewed formally at appropriate
intervals by senior management to ensure its continuing
suitability and effectiveness [ISO 9001 4.1.3] [ISO 9000-3
4.1.13] [Bellcore TR-NWT-000179 2.1.1-2 & 4.4.3-1] [Trillium]"
Where possible, the following order of precedence has been used:
When a definition cannot be found in the preceding documents, other sources are used. Only when no definition can be found is a new definition created.
In the process of preparing for an assessment, it may be necessary to adapt or translate the Trillium terminology and definitions into the common language, culture and context of the organization. This is done to minimize the variation due to interpretation by participants. This must be done carefully to ensure that the scope and intent of each practice is not altered.
The definitions below can also be found in the Glossary. They are included in this section because they are crucial to understanding the Model.
Note: In the Trillium context, an assessment is generally applied to a complete organization, or part thereof, that is responsible for the development of a specific product.
Note: in the Trillium context, the customer perceives the product as a black box entity provided by the supplier. The customer sees only the interfaces which provide access to the product's operation. Generally the customer has no view of the internal components inside the black box.
Note: in the Trillium context, this includes firmware regardless of its final manufactured form (e.g., PROM, Gate Array).
Back to the Trillium home page.
To the detailed Trillium table of contents.
Back one chapter.
Forward to capability area 1.![[UHCL]](uhcl-stamp.gif)